Which Aerospike driver implementation / client has the best performance and the most complete functionality?


Wondering which driver implementation has the best speed / completeness for the latest version. I am thinking lots of clients, synchronous mostly but async is not out of the question.

This is for a middle tier data pump design from scratch.


Please use the following client functionality table as a guide: http://www.aerospike.com/docs/architecture/clients.html (scroll to the table at the bottom of the page).


Hi Michael,

Pick that which is most convenient for your particular application, as Aerospike strives to make all its clients as high-performance as possible.

In terms of performance, it should come as no surprise that the generally higher-performing languages are better - namely, C, Java and C#.

For client parity, please refer to the client functionality table posted in Lucien’s answer, above.