Hi - thanks for the reply!
Yes of course, bad formulation of the scenario re. no.buckets. I was of course referring to the size of each bucket. An example of the behaviour we are seeing (on re separate clusters running Community Edition 3.9.1)
[nosql ~]# asinfo -v “set-config:context=namespace;id=namespace;obj-size-hist-max=100”
ok
[nosql ~]# asinfo -v “hist-dump:ns=namespace;set=ourSet;hist=objsz”
namespace:objsz=100,1,0,146340,9858766,661706158,356421068,70460602,39488554,32275604,32199957,11953013,6097935,4096001,3149467,2283234,1576467,1214199,970682,788656,647686,537745,449799,380105,323367,276506,239948,209114,183585,161156,143821,127278,113596,101785,90968,81065,71236,61704,53160,45433,38143,31949,26510,21958,18280,15212,12743,10839,8960,7740,6553,5639,4804,4009,3436,2923,2454,2072,1679,1410,1101,883,725,636,409,273,139,77,35,5,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
[nosql ~]# asinfo -v “set-config:context=namespace;id=namespace;obj-size-hist-max=1000”
ok
[nosql ~]# asinfo -v “hist-dump:ns=namespace;set=ourSet;hist=objsz”
namespace:objsz=100,1,0,146340,9858766,661706158,356421068,70460602,39488554,32275604,32199957,11953013,6097935,4096001,3149467,2283234,1576467,1214199,970682,788656,647686,537745,449799,380105,323367,276506,239948,209114,183585,161156,143821,127278,113596,101785,90968,81065,71236,61704,53160,45433,38143,31949,26510,21958,18280,15212,12743,10839,8960,7740,6553,5639,4804,4009,3436,2923,2454,2072,1679,1410,1101,883,725,636,409,273,139,77,35,5,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
[nosql ~]# asinfo -v “set-config:context=namespace;id=namespace;obj-size-hist-max=200”
ok
[nosql ~]# asinfo -v “hist-dump:ns=namespace;set=ourSet;hist=objsz”
namespace:objsz=100,1,0,146340,9858766,661706158,356421068,70460602,39488554,32275604,32199957,11953013,6097935,4096001,3149467,2283234,1576467,1214199,970682,788656,647686,537745,449799,380105,323367,276506,239948,209114,183585,161156,143821,127278,113596,101785,90968,81065,71236,61704,53160,45433,38143,31949,26510,21958,18280,15212,12743,10839,8960,7740,6553,5639,4804,4009,3436,2923,2454,2072,1679,1410,1101,883,725,636,409,273,139,77,35,5,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0;
Also, irrespective of the issue with us apparently being unable to change this value - should the config not be visible when interrogating the runtime configuration? Or is the intention that the 2nd digit of the objsz hist output is the only place to see it (*100)?
Thanks
Tom